Home > Hard Drive > 2.5 Vs 3.5 External Hard Drive Reliability

2.5 Vs 3.5 External Hard Drive Reliability


I HAVE NO SHARES OR FRIENDS IN SEAGATE OR HITACHI, but in there 30 years I definitely had much better (let us say normal) experience with quality of these other two Just as an example I have a WD Blue 2.5" not even 1 year old that was never even installed in a laptop and has been sitting in my desktop since Data centers typically have their drives running 99.99% of the time, while the average consumer would not, which is why there is a distinction between consumer and enterprise product. This field is required Join No Spam. Check This Out

WD Blue drives are like a wisper compared to them. Seagate obviously needs to improve their quality. WD hard drives Looks OK too me … Specially Their drives Latest Feature like "Secure Park" "Intelli Seek" etccc… http://furqancomputertips.wordpress.com Furqan Hanif These Statistics Looks OK too me, My two Seagate I too am in the same boat. https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3972183

2.5 Vs 3.5 External Hard Drive Reliability

Most big scale operations don't use "Enterprise level" HW because it makes no financial sense to do so. But the most important thing is that you don't put all your eggs in one basket - SSD or hard drive, having a solid backup strategy is vital. I had bought 5 or 6 external drives from big name manufacturers with good reputations and every single one of them failed within 2 years. I think they give interesting details you just don't get from failure rates.

After that I always ONLY ordered Western Digital. It's not even 5 years old and it's already failing. Seagate seems to be buying its way in into the market. Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016 While 3K drives is a nice sample size it stands starkly in contrast to the roughly 13K drive sample size for Seagate/Hitachi.

Oh and HGST is now a WD company. 2.5 Vs 3.5 Hdd Performance For true high performance and high reliability, it's the "enterprise" drives (usually with SAS controllers) you're looking for - but at at least twice the price. Reply Reply with quote Complain Ron Zamir OP • Senior Member • Posts: 1,036 Re: 2.5" vs 3.5" external hard drives, which is more reliable? https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/175089-who-makes-the-most-reliable-hard-drives Ron Zamir's gear list:Ron Zamir's gear list Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Olympus E-1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Reply Reply with quote Complain NewsyL • Veteran Member • Posts: 5,696 Re: 2.5"

We have been offered lower (much lower) quantities of Toshiba drives at a higher unit price but that doesn't make much business sense. Seagate Vs Western Digital External Hard Drive Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Joel Lee 1434 articles Joel Lee is a writer from Philadelphia and the Tech Explained editor. And rather than order 1,000 drives directly from a manufacturer, the company in the past has said it sourced hard drives by buying consumer external backup drives and “shucking” the hard drives Remember Quantum ?

2.5 Vs 3.5 Hdd Performance

Rail 5+1 and Raid5+2 which put extra copies of the parity bits on 2 or 3 drives respectively are the norm. http://serverfault.com/questions/244629/is-there-a-reliability-difference-between-2-5-and-3-5-hdds Now that you are managing your failure rate, please give CrashPlan some competition, so I can come back and be happy and secure with my backups. 2.5 Vs 3.5 External Hard Drive Reliability share Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Email Link Like + Quote Reply ucfgrad93, Feb 15, 2010 ucfgrad93 macrumors P6 Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Location: Colorado #11 Badger^2 said: ↑ All Difference Between 2.5 And 3.5 External Hard Drive This is called the mean time before failure, or MTBF for short.

Lord, I despise that dickhead. his comment is here Also, external drives are not indestructible. HDD Via Shutterstock, Form Factor Comparison Via Shutterstock, Open Hard Drive Via Shutterstock, SSD Diagram Via Shutterstock, External Hard Drive Via Shutterstock Previous PostShould You Buy Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare?Next Damon well thats understandable. 2.5 Vs 3.5 Hdd Server

The 2.5″ Seagate Momentus ST9750423AS (5400 RPM) HDD seems to have held up good so far for me. Just lost 3TB from a HGST, so I'm not so gung ho about reliability there. Raymond Savoie Those 29,000+ Seagate 4TB drives (ST4000DM000) they are desktop-class drives and are not NAS certified by Seagate, unless I'm mistaken. this contact form For example, a 2TB desktop external hard drive, usually a 3.5-inch, is over 2 pounds, yet its portable counterpart, usually a 2.5-inch, is merely half a pound!

In your case, you're environment most likely less tolerant of drive failure and so using purpose built NAS drives may be a better choice for you. Hgst Hard Drive Andy Klein We buy drives via the reseller channel. The readily available and highly competitive price of the Seagate 4TB drives, along with their solid performance and respectable failure rates, have made them our drive of choice.

For as little as $50, you can add a terabyte (TB) to your laptop or desktop via an external drive.

it's on a site called "petapixel" in case they don't let me link…. If so how do you schedule this to avoid a performance hit? Im sure your handfull of drives gives you a much better sample size to draw a statistical analyisys from… Xplorer4x4 While I wouldn't go as far as "junk science" the percentages Most Reliable Portable Hard Drive you're such a poser.

Maybe time to consider getting an external backup drive. Or if you’re buying the drive mainly as a backup drive, go with a traditional HDD. Cellar Dweller I too am very shocked. http://maccomputersupply.com/hard-drive/external-hard-drive-not-detected.html For the first way, there are four things required: A defined group to observe, in our case a group of drives, usually by model, a period of observation, typically a year,

Xavier de Miguel From the data, it seems to me that WD has a quality control problem. The 1TB size means the process runs quickly, but is still thorough. They're buying the models with the highest calculated value for money. Once the "burn-in" process is complete, the WD 1TB drives are removed and we put 4- or 6TB drives in the pods for the cushy job of storing customer data.

I always backup, I've learned it on my own expense. These commissions do not affect how we test, rate or review products. Here's a link to our design: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/cloud-storage-hardware The Storage Pods are stacked in a standard rack up to 10 pods in a rack, a good image is here: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/200-petabytes-of-customer-data-and-counting Bill McKenzie Read More properly in order to extend its lifespan and keep it clean with these hard drive organization tips Go Clean Your Hard Drive: 5 Things You Can Do in 10

If you have a large amount of data to restore, you can order a hard drive from us with your data on it for $189. Principal contributors to the claims are the lesser mass and the extra engineering that goes into making 2.5" drives survive the more harsh conditions of mobile use (specifically, temperature and shock/vibration). But if they're lasting that long in your sweatbox environment, the chances of them spontaneously failing under normal desktop usage is infinitesimally small.

© Copyright 2017 maccomputersupply.com. All rights reserved.